God Particle
Posted by Bob on Fire
Bob on Fire

July 1st, 2008

Come August man might destroy the earth!

Someplace in France they have built this huge James Bond villain underground lair thing that forms a 17 mile long ring. “Scientist” or as I call them, “God hunters” will shoot 2 beams of particles at nearly the speed of light around this giant ring. Smashing them into one another to basically see what happens. They explain it all away about trying to discover the basic parts of particles and life and so on. So of course you get the religious nuts coming out saying that we are messing with God’s work. HA! I love them.

I don’t care about all that though. But what I do care about is if this smashing of particles rips open a black hole and swallows the earth! Some say it might happen but these so called experts say it’s about a 1 in 50 million chance. Wouldn’t you think any chance to destroy the Earth instantly would be a good enough reason to not do something?

And don’t try to make the argument that we’re killing the Earth all the time. Because right now global warming is to a fatty cheese burger killing a dude as black hole is to shooting that guy in the head. Apples and oranges here people. If I lost you on that part I don’t care. Because we are all gonna die come August anyway. START LIVING LIFE PEOPLE! I’m gonna start with this sweet double cheese burger. Yummmmmm………….

4 Responses to “God Particle”

  1. Will
    Will Says:

    I like how you’re just learning what an atom smasher is and how it strikes you as science fiction. Classic, Bob. Classic.

  2. Timmy
    Timmy Says:

    It’s the biggest scientific experiment ever! I think thats what Bob was getting at. It could destroy everything and find out so much all at the same time! Its never been done before like this. WHY DOES NOBODY CARE ABOUT IT?!

  3. Will
    Will Says:

    This is just the biggest one THEY’RE TELLING US ABOUT.

  4. schmitty Says:

    Apples and Oranges?…. “Apples and oranges aren’t that different, really. I mean, they’re both fruit. Their weight is extremely similar. They both contain acidic elements. They’re both roughly spherical. They serve the same social purpose. So how is this a metaphor for difference? I could understand if you said, ‘That’s like comparing apples with uranium,’ or ‘That’s like comparing apples with baby wolverines,’ or ‘That’s like comparing apples with the early work of Raymond Carver,’ or ‘That’s like comparing apples with hermaphroditic ground sloths.’ These would all be valid examples of profound disparity. But not apples and oranges. In every meaningful way, they’re virtually identical.” - Klosterman

Leave a Reply